Legal Opinion

John Hawes, Etc. v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, Nancy Kreitzer v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc., Daniel Ventura v. El Conquistador Hotel

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 5, 1976No. 75-1380 to 75-1382PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Senior Circuit Judge.

The sole question presented by these appeals is whether Local Rule 5 of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, which requires nondomiciliary plaintiffs to post security for costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees’ is consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Constitution of the United States. Rule 5, which became effective on June 1, 1974, provides as follows:

When the plaintiff is domiciled outside of Puerto Rico or is a foreign corporation, a bond shall be required to secure the costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees which…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Hmg Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Leslie RobertsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Donald K. Stern v. United States District Court for the District of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Deep Aggarwal v. Ponce School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API