Legal Opinion

Clair v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1939No. 19928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

Leave was given to submit supplemental Briefs, which have now been submitted.

*300Every litigant assumes an obligation to pay the costs which may be awarded against him. He is however not required to give bond to pay them unless so required by Statute or Rule of Court. A Rule of this Court required such a bond to be given by non-resident plaintiffs. This Rule was in force when this action was instituted, and as the plaintiff is a non-resident, she was subject to it. The Rule was however not invoked until the present motion. The new Rules of Civil Procedure became…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gillson v. Vendome Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1940
  2. Zeth v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Fontenot v. Cabot Carbon Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1948
  4. Hallstrom Development Co. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Marder v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API