Legal Opinion

Marks v. Pennsylvania R.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 21, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., and the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. Plaintiff is a resident of Manor, Pennsylvania. The injuries complained of were sustained at defendant’s Steel Car Shop at Pitcairn, Pennsylvania. Defendant admittedly does business within this state. The question is whether defendant can compel plaintiff to provide security for costs.

Rule 34 of the Civil Rulés of this Court is as follows:

“Whenever a procedural question arises which is not covered by the provisions of any statute of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Miles v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Schendel v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawkins v. International HarvesterDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API