Legal Opinion

Brookings State Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 30, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

In this case there is diversity of citizenship. A federal question is also involved. So it cannot be said that jurisdiction is founded only on the fact of diversity of citizenship. The defendant' is a federal reserve bank, with its head office and principal place of business in San Francisco, Cal, and with branch banks elsewhere, one of these being located at Portland, Or. Plaintiff has sued the defendant in this court, in tort. Service was had upon Frederick Greenwood, manager of the Portland Branch, within this jurisdiction, on November 18, 1922. On November 23d,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Hupfeld v. Automaton Piano Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  3. Briggs v. StroudU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1893
  4. Bacon v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1923
  5. Everett Ry., Light & Power Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landers v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Keller v. KeklikianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Feldman Inv. Co. v. Connecticut General Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  4. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  5. Bartner v. DebiasseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API