Legal Opinion

California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 30, 1992No. 193-87CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

BACKGROUND

This case is before the court on cross-motions by the parties for summary judgment. Plaintiff, State of California, acting by and through the California Department of Transportation, brought this action pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982). The jurisdiction of this court is uncontested by the parties.

In the original complaint filed with the court, plaintiff requested both money damages and declaratory relief. Plaintiff asserts a claim for damages arising from the government’s alleged breach of a contract (referred to as the Project Agreement) which…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Wells ex rel. Wells v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Sweet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API