Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. St. Louis Rams Partnership

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2013No. ED 99592PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherri B. Sullivan, J.

Introduction

Todd Hewitt (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his claim of employment discrimination and compelling its arbitration pursuant to the arbitration agreement between Appellant and his former employer, St. Louis Rams Partnership. We reverse.

Procedural Background

Appellant filed a petition against St. Louis Rams Partnership; The Rams Football Co., Inc.; ITB Football Co., LLC, and The St. Louis Rams, LLC (collectively Respondents), alleging a single claim of age discrimination in the termination of his employment in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Teson v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Baumruk v. BeltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. Mueller v. Hopkins & Howard, PCMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Deiab v. ShawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In the Interest of N.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellington v. Napleton's Mid-Rivers MotorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Charles Mems and Elaine Mems v. Dwayne A. LabruyereMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Hal Miller v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, EX REL. JOHN L. MESSEX, Relator v. THE HONORABLE KELLY PARKERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Todd Hewitt, Relator v. Honorable Kristine Kerr, Judge, Circuit Court for St. Louis County, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API