Legal Opinion

Deiab v. Shaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 2003No. ED 82890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, Chief Judge.

Harold Shaw d/b/a Capstone Builders (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order compelling arbitration pursuant to the motion of Tarek and Pamela Deiab (Plaintiffs). Because we find there is no final, appealable judgment, we dismiss the appeal.

In 2001, the parties entered into a contract for Defendant to build a residence for Plaintiffs. The contract contained an arbitration clause. After a dispute arose, Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant, alleging breach of contract. Defendant filed an answer to the petition as well as a motion to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Barrath Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Korte Construction Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. St. Louis Rams PartnershipMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Robinson v. ADVANCE LOANS II, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Burris v. American Heritage Homes, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. National Management Corp. v. KaplanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. SPRINGFIELD IRON & METAL, LLC v. WestfallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API