State Ex Rel. Baumruk v. Belt
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COVINGTON, Judge.
The issue before this Court is whether section 552.020.10(6), RSMo 1994, requires respondent to dismiss the criminal charges pending against relator, Kenneth Baumruk. Because the plain meaning of section 552.020.10(6) requires the dismissal of the criminal charges against relator, this Court makes the alternative order in mandamus peremptory as amended.
On May 5, 1992, relator attended a proceeding for the dissolution of his marriage in the St. Louis County courthouse. It is alleged that during this hearing relator shot and killed his wife. It is also alleged that relator shot…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- M.A.B. v. NicelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Pollock v. Wetterau Food Distribution GroupMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Newman v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis v. Members of the Board of Aldermen of the City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.