Legal Opinion

Teson v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 17, 1996No. 78991PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Section 577.041.1, RSMo 1994, requires that a law enforcement officer arresting a person for driving while intoxicated “shall *196inform the person ... that his license shall be immediately revoked upon his refusal to take the test [to determine the alcohol content of his blood].” When an arrestee refuses to submit to a chemical test and the arresting officer fails to use the word “immediately” in warning the arrestee of the consequences of refusal, may the Director of Revenue nevertheless revoke the arrestee’s driving privilege?

We hold that section 577.041.1 requires a law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Logan v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Vinson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Duffy v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Brown v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Baldridge v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. RotterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Lorton v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API