United States v. Frankfeld
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
On August 14, 1951 the defendants in the above case were indicted by the Grand Jury under 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 for conspiracy to violate a federal statute, the Smith Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2385. On September 28th all the defendants except Dorothy Rose Blumberg filed a motion for the suppression of evidence. The evidence to which the motion related was only very generally described as (1) all records of any kind made of or reflecting intercepted telephone communications of the defendants or attorneys at law who have appeared for them; (2) all other persons whose telephone…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- United States v. AskinsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- United States v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. FujimotoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1952
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.