Legal Opinion
United States v. Fujimoto
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 5, 1952No. Cr. 10495PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
The indictment 'here challenged was- returned on August 29, 1951, charging the seven defendants with conspiring to violate the Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385. This litigation is not yet at issue, for the defendants’ request for 90 days’ time within which to prepare and file various preliminary motions was granted without opposition by Judge Metzger. When on November 30, 1951, defendants filed nine motions, which when stacked measured some two and a quarter inches, the Government asked for 60 days to reply. Though the defendants were agreeable to having even more time…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cassell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
- United States v. Terrence Dean OaksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Alvin Chance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.