Motor Vehicle Administration v. Aiken
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
We are called upon in this case to construe, once again, the provisions of Maryland Code (2009 RepLVol.), § 16-205.1 of the Transportation Article (“TR”), Maryland’s so-called “implied consent, administrative per se law” (hereinafter, the “Statute”). 1 The Statute provides for automatic suspension of a driver’s license to drive if, inter alia, a test of the driver’s blood alcohol concentration produces a “result indicating an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more at the time of testing[.]” TR § 16-205.1(b)(l)(i)(l.). The Statute entitles a driver to challenge the order of suspension at a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. SheaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cosby v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. KrafftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. LoaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Com. v. Rozell, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.