Motor Vehicle Administration v. Loane
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
This case presents yet another opportunity to construe provisions of § 16-205. 1 of the Maryland Transportation Article (“T.R.”), known as Maryland’s “implied consent, administrative per se law” (hereinafter “the Statute”).1 Pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of the Statute, “[a]ny person who drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or on any private property that is used by the public in general in this State is deemed to have consented ... to take a test if the person should be detained on suspicion of driving or attempting to drive while under the influence of alcohol----”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Smack v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. KrafftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Wilson v. GottliebDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011