Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Loane

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 22, 2011No. 52, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

This case presents yet another opportunity to construe provisions of § 16-205. 1 of the Maryland Transportation Article (“T.R.”), known as Maryland’s “implied consent, administrative per se law” (hereinafter “the Statute”).1 Pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of the Statute, “[a]ny person who drives or attempts to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or on any private property that is used by the public in general in this State is deemed to have consented ... to take a test if the person should be detained on suspicion of driving or attempting to drive while under the influence of alcohol----”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. PEOPLE'S COUNSEL FOR BALTIMORE CTY. v. Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Smack v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Motor Vehicle Administration v. LytleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Administration v. KrafftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Motor Vehicle Administration v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Wilson v. GottliebDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API