Legal Opinion

Achille Bayart & Cie v. Crowe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 26, 2001No. 00-1302PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a fraudulent transfer action brought by the plaintiff-appellant, Achille Bayart & Cie (Achille Bayart), to recover the value of its debt plus double damages from the defendants-appellees, Byron and Ruth Crowe. The case was tried before a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs case, the defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 50(a). Finding the plaintiffs evidence insufficient to permit a jury to conclude that there was value in the assets of the defendants’ corporation which were over and above the amount of its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. WinchenbachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Coyante v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Drohan v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Vazquez-BotetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. Bose Corporation v. Jbl, Inc. And Infinity Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Abbott GmbH & Co. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API