Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Bloss

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 3, 1989No. Misc. No. 89-18; AFCMR Misc. No. 89-01PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

Appellant, a retired enlisted member of the United States Air Force, asks this Court to review the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Military Review [28 MJ 764 (1989)] denying his petition for extraordinary relief. Rules 4(b)(2) and 27(b), United States Court of Military Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure. See generally Unger v. Ziemniak, 27 MJ 349, 351-54 (CMA 1989). He asserted in his earlier petition for extraordinary relief that court-martial proceedings were unlawfully initiated against him after his retirement, for offenses…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Unger v. ZiemniakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. In the Matter of James Stewart Legare Haynes, Sr. And Joanne Grace Haynes, Debtors. Appeal of Ward W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. SloanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. Willenbring v. NeurauterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. ClineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API