Legal Opinion
Ingram v. O'BANNON
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 25, 1982No. Civ. A. 78-86PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
The plaintiff class consists of all those residing in Philadelphia who are or will be eligible for homemaker service, who have requested or will request this service, and who have not received or will not receive it. Within the class, the plaintiffs fall into two groups, applicants and former recipients. 1 The applicants are those persons who are eligible to receive the service based upon their financial status and need for the service. They have requested the service but have not received it. Their requests are placed on waiting lists until a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Quern v. MandleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faust v. MessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Alexander v. PolkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Meeker v. ManningDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1982