Legal Opinion
Cienega Gardens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 18, 2001No. 00-5104PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
This is a takings case. Appellants are forty-two partnerships (“Owners”) formed to develop and operate residential apartment buildings, primarily in California. Owners’ claims arise from Congress’ enactment of the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100-242, 101 Stat. 1877 (1987) (pertinent parts reprinted in 12 U.S.C. § 17151, note (1994) (Preservation of Low Income Housing) (“ELIHPA”)) and the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 (codified at 12 U.S.C. §§ 4101-4147 (1994)) (“LIH-PRHA”), both of which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- American Pelagic Fishing Company, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Air Pegasus of d.c., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc., Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.