Legal Opinion
Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc., Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 25, 2005No. 04-5099PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum (collectively “the Members”) are individual members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc. The Members individually appeal the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (the “trial court”) awarding summary judgment to the United States (“the government”) on the ground that the Members possessed no compensa-ble property interest in the peanut quota allocated to them under the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-127, § 155, 110 Stat. 888, 922-30 (the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Dennis Melancon v. City of New Orleans, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- American Bankers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Kafka v. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.