Legal Opinion

W. S. King & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 3, 1934No. M-91PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Booth, Olvief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff is incorporated under the name of W. S. King & Company, and is engaged in construction and repair *331work. The office of the corporation is in Philadelphia, Pa. On April 11, 1930, plaintiff and defendant, the latter acting through the Militia Bureau of the War Department, signed a contract obligating the plaintiff to reroof sixty-three buildings at Camp Beauregard, Louisiana, for which it was to receive $8,750. The work was to commence immediately and be completed by June 11, 1930.

The plaintiff at once assembled the materials…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Electric Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  4. George Leary Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Pneumatic Gun-Carriage & Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Centaur Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API