Legal Opinion

Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 12, 1923No. A-67PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Downey, Jvdye,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The action is for the recovery of $979 deducted from the amount otherwise due plaintiff, as liquidated damages for delay in the performance of a contract. It is averred and not disputed that the plaintiff was granted an extension of time for 47 days, but the disbursing officer in paying the final voucher for the amount found to be due plaintiff did not see fit to assume the responsibility of determining that the extension of time had been properly granted and refused payment to that extent. A claim was filed with the Auditor for the War…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Penn Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  2. George Leary Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  3. Maryland Dredging & Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Oltedale v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1941
  5. Coast Coaling & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API