Williams v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM * MDL No. 2775 HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP * Master Docket No. 1:17-md-2775 IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION * * JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE ok * THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO * CERTAIN BHR TRACK CASES k . MEMORANDUM Now pending is Smith & Nephew’s (“S&N”) motion to dismiss all or most of the claims in 27 BHR track cases! as time barred. (ECF 175 5). In response to S&N’s motion, the plaintiffs have asked the court for leave to file amended short form complaints in the identified cases to add facts…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Matrix Capital Management Fund v. BearingPoint, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.