Legal Opinion

Williams v. Smith & Nephew Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 24, 2020No. 1:14-cv-03138Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM * MDL No. 2775 HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP * Master Docket No. 1:17-md-2775 IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION * * JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE ok * THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO * CERTAIN BHR TRACK CASES k . MEMORANDUM Now pending is Smith & Nephew’s (“S&N”) motion to dismiss all or most of the claims in 27 BHR track cases! as time barred. (ECF 175 5). In response to S&N’s motion, the plaintiffs have asked the court for leave to file amended short form complaints in the identified cases to add facts…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Bizzie Walters v. Todd McMahenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Matrix Capital Management Fund v. BearingPoint, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API