Legal Opinion

State v. Ahearn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 821SC78PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47HEDRICK, Judge.

The prison terms imposed by the trial court in the present case exceed the designated presumptive terms prescribed by G.S. § 15A-1340.4(f), and in imposing such terms the trial court was required by G.S. § 15A-1340.4(b) to list the factors he found in aggravation and mitigation. This appeal is pursuant to G.S. § 15A-1444(al) which states:

A defendant who has . . . entered a plea of guilty ... to a felony, is entitled to appeal as a matter of right the issue of whether his sentence is supported by evidence introduced at the trial and sentencing hearing only if the prison term of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. RivardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. State v. AbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. AbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. AbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API