Legal Opinion

State v. Rivard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1982No. 815SC1344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants first assign error to the denial of their motions to quash the bills of indictment. G.S. § 15A-1444(e) in pertinent part provides:

Except as provided in subsection (al) of this section [such subsection dealing with a guilty-pleading defendant’s right to appeal the prison term to which he is sentenced] and G.S. 15A-979 [dealing with a guilty-pléading defendant’s right to appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress evidence], and except when a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest has been denied, the defendant is not entitled to appellate review as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Torres v. Puerto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Houshang SheikhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. LaughmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. AhearnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API