Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Standard Gypsum, L.L.C.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 26, 2001No. 04-01-00003-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING AS TO APPELLEE TEMPLE FOREST AND APPEL-LEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CLARIFY JUDGMENT

KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

We deny the motion for rehearing filed by Mitchell Ingalls and grant the motion to clarify the judgment filed by Standard Gypsum L.L.C. (“Standard Gypsum”), Standard Gypsum Corporation (“the corporation”), McQueeney Gypsum Company (“McQueeney”), and Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation (“Temple-Inland”). We withdraw our opinion and judgment issued on November 21, 2001 and substitute the following in its place. This is an appeal from a summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ryland Group, Inc. v. HoodTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Western Steel Co. v. AltenburgTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Swepi, L.P. v. Camden Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  3. Fitz v. Days Inns Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  4. Coronado v. Schoenmann Produce Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Calvasina ex rel. Calvasina v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API