Svarney v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit Judge.
By this writ of error a reversal is sought of a judgment discharging a writ of habeas corpus and remanding plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant, to the proper authorities for deportation under a warrant theretofore issued by the United States Department of Labor. The proper method of review was by appeal, instead of by writ of error. Fisher v. Baker, 203 U. S. 174, 27 S. Ct. 135, 51 L. Ed. 142, 7 Ann. Cas. 1018; In re Graves (C. C. A.) 270 F. 181. In view, however, of the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. 727, § 4 [Comp. St. § 1649a]), we disregard the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States Ex Rel. Bilokumsky v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Gonzales v. ZurbrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Vicente Navarrette-Navarrette v. H. R. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Hays v. ZahariadesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.