Poulsen v. Charlton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
This is an action for property damage arising from the flooding by rain water of a bridal gown shop and photography studio. Separate actions were brought by the plaintiffs Marguerite Poulsen and Harold Poulsen, the tenants, against the landlords, Wilfred and Dorothy Charlton, a general contractor, W. H. Crawford, 1 and a subcontractor, J.G. Meadows Roofing Company. The actions were consolidated and only the issue of liability was tried. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case each defendant made a motion for judgment which was denied. Defendants Meadows and Crawford then rested without offering…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Dow v. Holly Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Srithong v. Total Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Golden v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- McGowen v. Tri-County Gas CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.