Legal Opinion

COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Smelcer

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1994No. A93A1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Presiding Judge.

The issue is whether land which contains a permanently affixed but abandoned structure is “vacant land” for the purposes of coverage under a homeowner’s liability policy.

Smelcer owned a home that was insured under a homeowner’s policy issued by Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company. He and other family members owned a separate parcel of land approximately two-and-one-fourth to three miles from his home on which was located his maternal family’s abandoned old house and an abandoned old country store. During the term of the homeowner’s policy, vandals set fire to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Brown v. Peninsular Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. Bianchi v. Westfield InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citation Insurance v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Quintanilla v. RathurCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Sofran Peachtree City, LLC v. Peachtree City Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Horace Mann Insurance v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance v. PageAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API