Legal Opinion

State v. Lynaugh

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 17, 1992No. 91-030 and 91-159PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and obtained suppression of his breath test in the criminal case and a dismissal of the civil suspension proceeding. The trial court granted this relief because it found that the police had misled defendant about his right to counsel. The State took an interlocutory appeal from the suppression order and a direct appeal of the dismissal, both consolidated here. We reverse.

The facts are undisputed. During defendant’s processing for DUI, an officer read to him a so-called “implied consent” form *73which contained information on the right…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarmodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. State v. HammSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. State v. LucarelliCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. State v. NemkovichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API