Legal Opinion

State v. Madonna

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 19, 1999No. 98-352PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The State appeals the district court’s judgment for defendant in a civil license suspension hearing. The issue on appeal is whether the consent form read to defendant informing him of his right to counsel prior to deciding whether to take a breath test adequately advised defendant of his right to speak to a public defender regardless of his income level. We affirm.

During DUI processing, the officer read to defendant from a standard processing form designed to advise motorists of their light under 23 V.S.A. § 1202(c) to consult with an attorney prior to deciding whether to submit to a breath…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. State v. GarveySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. State v. LynaughSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. State v. VezinaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. State v. Paul AikenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. Randall J. SheperdSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. State v. RoyaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API