Legal Opinion
Weimer v. Bunbury
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1874PublishedCited by 85 opinions
Error to Berrien Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Bunbury sued Joseph W. 'Weimer and Samuel Hess in trespass for taking and carrying away certain liyery stock in his possession, and owned by him. The- defendants, under their plea of the. general issue, gave notice of the following facts in justification of the alleged trespass:
That in the year 1872, Thomas A. Bunbury was treasurer of the city of Niles; that the state and county taxes apportioned to said city for that year were as follows; three thousand three hundred and five dollars and eighty-seven cents to the first and fourth wards, and four thous- and nine hundred and sixty-nine dollars…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.