Legal Opinion
Krupinsky v. Birsky
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided June 1, 1971No. 83-70PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is an appeal from the Windsor County Court of Chancery involving the validity of a claimed option granted on August 30, 1961, to S. R. Young, Inc., by Bolesof Birsky, Marjorie Birsky, Alphonse Birsky, Myrtle Birsky, Michael Yarosevich and Albina Yarosevich. Findings of fact made by the Windsor County Court of Chancery, after hearing, and the decree of the Chancellor, held the claimed option to be invalid.
An agreement was entered into by the Birskys above enumerated and S. R. Young, Inc., on August 30,1961:
“DEPOSIT RECEIPT AND SALES AGREEMENT
Springfield, Vermont, August 30, 1961
Received…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- First Nat. Bank of St. Johnsbury v. LaperleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Tamura v. DeIuliisOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Lapoint v. Dumont Construction CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Toys, Inc. v. F.M. Burlington Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Harden v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Tolman v. CarrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Bischoff v. Bletz, Sr., Van Guilder and WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010