Legal Opinion

Tamura v. DeIuliis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1955PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The plaintiff was the lessee of lands described in the complaint and belonging to the defendant E. De-Iuliis. He brings this suit seeking a reformation of the lease by correcting the description of the property. The right to such reformation was not contested. The trial court properly entered a decree reforming the lease by correcting the description. The contested issue in the case relates to the rights of the plaintiff under certain provisions of the lease, by virtue of which the plaintiff claims a right to purchase the property or in the alternative to have a renewal of the lease. He seeks…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Gunsenhiser v. BinderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ReisnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Roy v. George W. Greene, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Gochman v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API