Legal Opinion
Bischoff v. Bletz, Sr., Van Guilder and White
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 21, 2010No. 2009-192PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Rodney White appeals from a superior court judgment requiring that he pay the full purchase price offered by third-party purchasers William, David and Peter Bischoff (the Bischoffs) as a requirement of exercising his right of first refusal for certain real property owned by sellers Donald L. Bletz, Sr. and Bruce Van Guilder (sellers). We affirm.
¶2. This is the second appeal to arise from this real property dispute. Most of the salient facts are set forth in our earlier ruling in Bischoff v. Bletz, 2008 VT 16, 183 Vt. 235, 949 A.2d 420, and may be summarized as follows. In 1978, White…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bischoff v. BletzSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- West Texas Transmission, L.P. v. Enron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Department of Corrections v. Matrix Health Systems, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Kroehnke v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donald L. Bletz Sr. & Bruce Van Guilder v. John J. Welch, Jr., Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013