In re the Detention of Ward
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Bradley Ward petitioned the trial court for release from commitment as a sexually violent predator. At the hearing to determine whether probable cause exists to warrant a full trial on the issue, Ward presented a report from an expert who opined that he is not a sexually violent predator. The trial court concluded that Ward did not establish probable cause because, inter alia, the expert relied on changes in diagnostic practices to conclude that Ward had “so changed” under RCW 71.09.090. We hold that new diagnostic practices can be the basis for change under RCW 71.09.090. We further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Detention of Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. McCuistionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Detention of AmbersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Detention of AmbersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Personal Restraint of MeirhoferWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Detention of FoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.