Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2004No. 51468-7-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

— The trial court terminated Andre Brigham Young’s annual show cause hearing under RCW 71.09.090 without further proceedings, ruling that Young had not presented prima facie evidence that his condition had so changed that he was no longer a sexually violent predator (SVP). We granted discretionary review to decide whether the trial court erred by improperly weighing the evidence and by failing to order a hearing on his SVP status. Because the actuarial risk assessment evidence Young presented, diagnostic tools that were not available when he was committed in 1991, makes a prima facie showing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Detention of Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Guile v. Ballard Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. NordlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. McCuistionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re Detention of AmbersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Detention of AmbersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re Detention of ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API