Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
On August 20, 2015, Defendant Syman-tec Corp. filed a motion to stay the case *1034pending completion of inter partes review' (“IPR”) proceedings. Dkt. 108 (“Mot”). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, both in their submissions to the Court and during the hearing on October 1, 2015. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Syman-tec’s Motion to Stay.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The America Invents Act
By enacting the Leahy-Smith Anierica Invents Act (“AIA”), Congress sought to “establish a more…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Abbott Laboratories v. Cordis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- At & T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I v. TiVo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
3Cited by23 opinions
- AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Anderson Power Products, Inc. v. Bizlink Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Beatbot Technology (USA) Co., Ltd.; Deepwater Innovation Technology (Hong Kong) Limited; Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. v. Zodiac Pool Systems LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026
- BiTMICRO LLC v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Brice Environmental ServicesCorporation v. Arcadis U.S., Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.