Legal Opinion

Brice Environmental ServicesCorporation v. Arcadis U.S., Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 27, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00141Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA BRICE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORPORATION, a Subsidiary of Claisa Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-00141-JMK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING CONSENTED- vs. TO MOTION TO STAY AND JOINT STIPULATION ARCADIS U.S., INC., Defendant. Before the Court at Docket 42 is Defendant Arcadis U.S. Inc.’s Consented- To Motion to Stay (the “Motion”). Also pending before the Court at Docket 43 is Defendant and Plaintiff Brice Environmental Services Corporation’s (together, the “Parties”) proposed Joint Stipulation Regarding Motion to Stay Pending Resolution…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  4. Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API