Legal Opinion

BiTMICRO LLC v. Intel Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 27, 2023No. 5:23-cv-00625Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 BITMICRO LLC, Case No. 5:23-cv-00625-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 v. STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW 11 INTEL CORPORATION, 12 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 70 13 Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) moves to stay this patent infringement case pending 14 inter partes review (“IPR”). See Intel’s Notice of Mot. and Mot. to Stay Pending IPR (“Mot.”), 15 ECF No. 70. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN 16 PART Intel’s motion. 17…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API