Coppley v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
Here we consider whether the Commission misapplied the law by erroneously placing the initial burden on defendant to prove that plaintiff was capable of earning pre-injury wages in other employment without first requiring plaintiff to meet her initial burden of proving all three Hilliard “disability” factors. In worker’s compensation cases, plaintiff has the initial burden of proving that he suffers from a disability as a result of a work-related injury. Harrington v. Adams-Robinson Enterprises, 128 N.C. App. 496, 498, 495 S.E.2d 377, 379, rev’d on other grounds, 349 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Burwell v. Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- In Re Harrington v. Adams-Robinson EnterprisesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Heffner v. Cone Mills Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Brice v. Sheraton InnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Coppley v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Olivares-Juarez v. Showell FarmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Myers v. Bbf Printing SolutionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.