Legal Opinion

Brice v. Sheraton Inn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 2000No. COA99-418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the finding of the Industrial Commission that, although plaintiff was temporarily totally disabled, she was not permanently totally disabled. We affirm.

In 1990, plaintiff Mary L. Brice (Brice), then fifty years old, began working for defendant-employer Sheraton Inn (Sheraton). Her duties required her to perform repetitive tasks with her hands, including retrieving and sorting soiled towels and linens; loading commercial-size washers and dryers; ironing, folding, and stacking hotel laundry; transporting the pressed and folded laundry to another room; cleaning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Russell v. Lowes Product DistributionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Adams v. AVX CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Pittman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Oliver v. Lane Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Royce v. Rushco Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Clawson v. Phil Cline TruckingNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
  5. Hargrave v. Kentucky Derby HosieryNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API