Heffner v. Cone Mills Corp.

EAGLES, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant makes two basic arguments: (1) that the Commission erred in failing to make specific findings regarding his entitlement to future medical expenses; and (2) that the Commission’s findings on the issue of plaintiffs incapacity for work are insufficient.

I

In addressing plaintiffs right to have the defendant pay his medical expenses, the Commission included in its award the following:

2. Defendant shall pay all medical expenses incurred by plaintiff as a result of his occupational disease when bills for same have been submitted to the Commission through the…