Legal Opinion
Burke v. Bodewes
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 28, 2003No. 1:00-cv-00065PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CURTIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Thomas W. Burke, Curtis Zamerski, and Richard Kohl, as trustees of and/or participants in the Buffalo Carpenters Pension Fund (the “Fund”), brought this action pursuant to section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, seeking equitable relief and damages for alleged breach of fiduciary duty by eight current and former trustees of the Fund. 1 Four of the defendants — Terrence L. Bodewes, James Maloney, Ernest Bouchard, and Vincent Fetes (referred to herein as the “moving defendants”) — have moved for summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janese v. FayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Fuchs v. AllenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Janese v. FayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010