Legal Opinion

Klein v. Pincus

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1975No. 74 C 188PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues under the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (15 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq.) for three times the amount of actual damages sustained (or $1,500.00 whichever is the greater) plus reasonable attorneys fees on the ground that defendant reset or altered the odometer of a motor vehicle purchased by the plaintiff from the defendant and/or failed to disclose the cumulative mileage listed on the odometer or that the actual mileage was unknown.

The statute provides in pertinent part as follows:

“The Congress hereby finds that purchasers,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delay v. Hearn FordDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kathleen McGinty v. Beranger Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1977
  3. Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
  5. Clayton v. McCaryDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API