Legal Opinion
Clayton v. McCary
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 29, 1976No. Civ. A. C 76-153 APublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Plaintiff initiated this action to redress alleged tampering with an odometer in the sale of an automobile. The Court duly heard testimony and received exhibits on October 14 and 18, 1976. The following shall constitute the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
PLEADINGS
The complaint filed by plaintiff asserts a violation of the Odometer Requirements, Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq. for which treble damages are sought. Essentially,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delay v. Hearn FordDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Mataya v. Behm Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
- Brown v. Market Development, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974
- Pepp v. Superior Pontiac GMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Parker v. DeKalb Chrysler PlymouthDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
- Bryant v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1978
- Gerald Tinker v. Demaria Porsche-Audi, Inc. And Central National Bank of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Tye v. Spitzer-DodgeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- United States v. Dish Network LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.