Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Parker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Defendants C. B. Parker and his father, J. A. Parker, have appealed from a decree for $2,800, interest, and attorney’s fees, evidenced hy a note executed by defendants. The defense pleaded was, in substance, that defendants did not owe the debt and that the original note, of which the note sned on was a renewal, had been issued without actual consideration and as the result of some form of fraudulent imposition. Along with this defense to the real merits of the controversy, defendants sought to rely upon an alleged alteration in the original note, charging that when signed it was payable to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Auld v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Padgett v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Mersman v. WergesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Crandall v. First National Bank of AuburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. FloraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. Fairley v. FalconSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Klundby v. HogdenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Daniel Baker College v. AbneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API