Legal Opinion

Evarts v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1949No. L. A. 20591Published

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.2d 6 (1949)

E. F. EVARTS et al., Appellants,

v.

SAMUEL W. JOHNSTON et al., Respondents.

L. A. No. 20591.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 3, 1949.

E. F. Evarts, in pro. per., for Appellants.

Clarence B. Smith and H. L. Welch for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

E. F. Evarts and his wife agreed to purchase a ranch owned by Samuel W. and Sarah Johnston. The Johnstons canceled an escrow agreement made by the parties for the purpose of closing the transaction, and were then sued for specific performance of the contract. The appeal of the Evarts from an adverse judgment presents for decision only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Haddock v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Cockrill v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API