Legal Opinion
Mistick PBT v. Chao, Elaine
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 17, 2006No. 04-5340PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge.
Under the Davis-Baeon Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3141, et seq., bidders on certain construction projects funded by the federal government must pay workers specified wage rates based upon the type of work performed. See 40 U.S.C. § 3142. The Department of Labor (the “Department” or “Secretary”) determines the categories of jobs and the prevailing wage rates for those jobs in the community where the construction project will be undertaken. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1.1 — 1.9. This case involves the Department’s conformance regulations,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Biovail Corp. v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Actavis Elizabeth LLC v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.