Legal Opinion

Pankratz v. Teske

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2002No. 01-377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶ 1 David Pankratz (Pankratz) appeals from the Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Phillips County, order denying his petition for enforcement and/or modification of Parenting Plan. Stephanie J. Teske (Teske) cross-appeals the District Court’s determination of attorney’s fees.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Was the District Court’s finding that Teske complied with certain portions of the Parenting Plan clearly erroneous?

¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion in determining the amount of attorney’s fees and costs to be recovered by Teske?

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SyversonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Renner v. NemitzMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Custody of Arneson-NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Chamberlin v. Puckett ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Albrecht v. AlbrechtMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re the Marriage of RobisonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of the Wage Claim of Ramsey v. Yellowstone Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re the Marriage of KlattMontana Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API