Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of San Luis Obispo

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1897No. L. A. No. 273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, San Luis Obispo County; Y. A. Gregg, Judge. Suit by P. W. Murphy against the city of San Luis Obispo and others. From a judgment for defendants and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

This is an action brought to enjoin the defendants from selling or disposing of certain bonds issued, but not yet sold, by the city of San Luis Obispo (one of the defendants), and to restrain defendants from levying the taxes mentioned in the complaint, and from enforcing a certain ordinance of the said city. The cause was tried by the court, and judgment given for the defendants. The appeal is from the judgment, and also from the order of the court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Appellant presents three grounds of attack upon the bonds in question: First, that The…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lay v. ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollywood Union High School District v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Oklahoma Utilities Co. v. City of HominySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API