Legal Opinion

United States v. Torres-Laranega

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 2, 2012No. 11-2202UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY **

TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Jorge Torres-Laranega, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his application for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He also seeks leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we construe Torres-Laranega’s filings liberally because he is proceeding pro se. See Hall v. Bellman, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 & n. 3 (10th Cir.1991).

We agree with the district court that Torres-Laranega was not entitled to relief under § 2255.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zajac v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2015
  2. Hahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
  3. Hahn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  4. Hohn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  5. In re: CCA Recordings 2255 LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API